The study was by far the largest to date. It examined 55,700 people, including rescue and recovery workers who were present at the World Trade Center site, on barges or at the Staten Island landfill where debris was taken in the nine months after Sept. 11, 2001, as well as residents of Lower Manhattan, students, workers and passers-by exposed on the day of the terrorist attacks. Over all, there was no increase in the cancer rate of those studied compared with the rate of the general population, researchers concluded after looking at 23 cancers from 2003 to 2008. The prevalence of three cancers — multiple myeloma, prostate and thyroid — was significantly higher, but only in rescue and recovery workers and not in the rest of the exposed population. But since the number of actual cases was small and the subjects of the study may have been screened more frequently for cancer than other people on average, the researchers noted that it was too early to draw any correlation to time spent at ground zero. In one of many counterintuitive findings, the incidence of cancer was not higher among those who were exposed more intensely to the toxic substances than among those who were exposed less. The lack of clear evidence of a link between cancer and the debris from Sept. 11 casts into doubt the decision by the federal government in June to add 50 different types of cancer to the list of illnesses covered by the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, signed by President Obama in early 2011. That decision meant that people with other sicknesses linked more strongly to ground zero were likely to receive less money. Dr. Thomas A. Farley, the health commissioner in New York City, said in an interview on Monday that it was too soon to take the study as a repudiation of the government’s decision. “Cancers take 20 years to develop,” Dr. Farley said, “and we might see something different 20 years down the line.” But echoing Dr. John Howard, head of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, who made the final decision on covering cancer, the commissioner added, “You don’t want to wait 20 to 30 years to get a definitive answer” to people suffering today. On Tuesday, Dr. Howard issued a statement that said, “The W.T.C. Health Program welcomes this addition to the peer-reviewed scientific literature, and we have long encouraged the growth of such peer-reviewed research.” Dr. Alfred I. Neugut, an oncologist and professor of epidemiology at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University, said he was not surprised by the study. “I think, given the time frame and the exposures,” he said, “that there wasn’t a high likelihood that there would be an elevated risk, certainly for cancer, and to the degree that it was, it would not be for the cancers that they’re finding.” Dr. Neugut said he sympathized with people who had cancer they attributed to the disaster, but added that their emotional response was not necessarily valid scientifically. “The 9/11 attack was a terrible thing, but it doesn’t cause everything in the world,” he said. “Cancer is a very specific outcome, and in most exposures, you have to be exposed for an extended time before you get the cancer.” Initially, the money set aside by the law — $2.8 billion to compensate victims and $1.5 billion for monitoring and treatment costs not covered by health insurance — covered mainly respiratory illnesses. (Mental health problems were included in the treatment fund but not the compensation fund.) Studies by the city health department have found asthma and post-traumatic stress disorder to be linked to the 2001 attacks. But cancer is expected to be far more expensive to treat than other qualifying illnesses, and the economic loss caused by cancer could require more compensation, since many cancer patients cannot work, and some have died. The study was released on Tuesday, and was to be published in the Wednesday issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association — too late to influence Dr. Howard’s decision, but perhaps not too late to influence public opinion going forward or to affect whether Congress will decide to replenish the victim compensation fund should more money be needed. The fund has not yet begun making payments, and it is supposed to make its final payments in 2016-17. In the meantime, some police officers and other rescue and recovery workers who worked at ground zero and have cancer have been receiving enhanced pension benefits based on a 2005 state law that said they were presumed to have contracted cancer from the ground zero substances.
CÂN ĐIỆN TỬ VIỆT NAM, CÂN ĐIỆN TỬ GIÁ RẺ LÀ MỘT TRONG NHỮNG DỊCH VỤ VÀ SẢN PHẨM CHÍNH TẠI KHẢI HOÀN. LIÊN HỆ VỚI CHÚNG TÔI ĐỂ ĐƯỢC TƯ VẤN TỐT NHẤT
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn health. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn health. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Thứ Tư, 19 tháng 12, 2012
Thứ Ba, 18 tháng 12, 2012
Philippines sexual health bill passes
Members of the Philippines House of Representatives are shown in Quezon City, in suburban Manila, earlier this year."Historic vote today for women and families," a presidential spokesman saysThe bill provides sex education classes and government-funded contraceptionThe Catholic Church opposes the bill, which has widespread public supportIt is "a sad day for the country," a Catholic bishop says(CNN) -- Lawmakers on Monday approved legislation calling for government-funded contraception and sex education classes in the Philippines, a first in the heavily Catholic nation.
"Our legislature took an historic vote today for women and families as it successfully passed the Reproductive Health Bill. We thank our senators and congressmen who voted for access to information and care," said presidential spokesman Edwin Lacierda.A reconciliation committee must now work out differences in the versions of the legislation passed by each house before it is sent to President Benigno Aquino, who is expected to sign it.Legislative leaders hope to finish their work and send the bill to Aquino by Wednesday before going on Christmas break, the official Philippines News Agency reported.Despite widespread popular support, the Catholic Church has opposed the measure, saying it will destroy marriage and morality in the Philippines.More than 80% of the Philippines' 96 million residents are Catholic.Gabriel Reyes, bishop of the diocese of Antiopolo and chairman of the Episcopal Commission on Family and Life, said the passage of the bill marked "a sad day for the country."But Lacierda said the legislation will help the country's citizens to raise families in a "just and empowered" way."The passage of the Responsible Parenthood Bill signals not only a new chapter in our agenda of inclusive growth; it also begins a process of healing for the wounds that may have been opened by an often feisty democracy," he noted.Sen. Edgardo Angara, who voted for the measure, called the bill "an affirmation of human rights," according to CNN affiliate ABS-CBN."We have to consider that not all Filipinos are Catholics. We have Muslims, Protestants, Buddhists, nonbelievers," he said, according to ABS-CBN.
A gunman opened fire in a Connecticut school on December 14. Learn more about the victims - 20 of them children, officials say.December 17, 2012 -- Updated 1030 GMT (1830 HKT)
How a massacre in Australia resulted in tougher rules on the ownership of firearms -- and how that changed the country.December 16, 2012 -- Updated 0830 GMT (1630 HKT)
Two schools, two attacks, two countries on the same day. But in China there were no fatalities: the attacker used a knife, not a gun.December 17, 2012 -- Updated 1312 GMT (2112 HKT)
The shocking scenes at Sandy Hook Elementary School have added another name to the list of small towns scarred by tragedy.December 17, 2012 -- Updated 1113 GMT (1913 HKT)
The North Korean leader may have departed from his father's style, but repression and malnutrition remain.
Malala or Merkel? Zuckerberg or Baumgartner? Tell us the famous face who mattered most to you during the last 12 months.December 17, 2012 -- Updated 1605 GMT (0005 HKT)
When Aesha Mohammadzai's disfigured image appeared on Time magazine, it symbolized the oppression of Afghan women. What happened next?December 14, 2012 -- Updated 2057 GMT (0457 HKT)
The war has forced hundreds of thousands of people from their homes; the lucky ones have found shelter across the border in crammed camps.December 14, 2012 -- Updated 0335 GMT (1135 HKT)
Tensions with the U.S., the push to clean corruption and plans to land on the moon are trends to watch next year, writes Kristie Lu Stout.December 13, 2012 -- Updated 1345 GMT (2145 HKT)
She's laid down the law in female skiing; now Lindsey Vonn is pondering legal action in her quest to test herself against male skiers.
Kaye Martindale and Geoff Brokate traveled through Pakistan for eight months photographing local women, including Malala Yousafzai.December 14, 2012 -- Updated 1205 GMT (2005 HKT)
CNN's Ivan Watson speaks with a Syrian violinist in exile in Turkey.December 14, 2012 -- Updated 1041 GMT (1841 HKT)
Greece's financial crisis is causing some to escape the big cities and opt instead for rural living. CNN's Diana Magnay reports.
Today's five most popular stories
Đăng ký:
Nhận xét (Atom)